Cleveland Browns to make Shedeur Sanders backup QB for Watson – Stupidest choice ever

Cleveland Browns to make Shedeur Sanders backup QB for Watson - Stupidest choice ever

The Cleveland Browns have named Deshaun Watson their starting quarterback for Week 1, a decision that has sparked immediate backlash and left at least one NFL analyst publicly stunned. The announcement came less than 48 hours after Watson was booed by Browns fans during a preseason appearance and made remarks that some interpreted as suggesting he expects hostility from his own crowd. Watson struggled in his most recent preseason outing, the team struggled around him, and the home crowd turned on him. Shortly afterward, he spoke about feeling more love on the road than at home and used the phrase “17 away games” when describing what his experience in Cleveland has been like.

Thumbnail

One analyst said he was shocked by the decision and felt awful for the Browns fan base, arguing that the performance and the interaction with the crowd should have factored into the evaluation. The analyst acknowledged that if the decision were purely about football, he would accept the choice. But he noted that in preseason Week 2, backup quarterback Shadore Sanders was markedly better than Watson, making the call harder to understand. Browns offensive coordinator Todd Monken has reportedly settled on Watson as the starter, a decision that has been widely reported.

The team has insisted publicly that the competition was open, but many observers believed the job was Watson’s to lose from the start. Cleveland’s decision cannot be separated from the massive investment behind it. The Browns gave Watson a five-year, $230 million fully guaranteed contract and traded significant draft capital to acquire him, despite the off-field scandal that engulfed his time in Houston. The team is still searching for the quarterback who once nearly produced a 5,000-yard season with the Texans.

That remains the gamble, and the hope is that version of Watson is still somewhere inside him. Sitting behind him is Sanders, a young quarterback the fan base has clearly embraced. Sanders showed flashes in preseason, moved the offense, and delivered a touchdown. Watson, meanwhile, looked poor in his latest appearance.

Critics believe the competition may never have been completely even. Some pointed out that Watson started the road game while Sanders started at home, and that Watson was later given favorable circumstances in his second appearance. The plan appeared to be to give Watson the easiest possible setup to look good and quiet the criticism. It did not work.

The boos returned, and the controversy followed. Watson’s comments about negativity and road games made the situation more uncomfortable. Even if those feelings are understandable, saying them publicly was risky for a quarterback trying to rebuild trust with a skeptical fan base. Now every home game becomes a referendum.

Every mistake will be magnified, every interception will bring back the boos, and every time Sanders enters the conversation, the pressure grows heavier. The decision to name Watson the starter was backed by the head coach and the front office, but the tension remains unresolved. The fan base wants Sanders, and they have made that clear. If Watson struggles again, the question will not just be about him.

It will be why Sanders is not playing. And if Sanders eventually gets his opportunity and succeeds, this decision could haunt Cleveland for months. Beyond the quarterback debate, the broader instability in football is becoming harder to ignore. In college football, players are chasing bigger opportunities and programs are competing for talent in a system that has been compared to the Wild West.

One analyst raised a provocative question: if an NFL team drafts a player and invests years and money into him, and that player later decides college football is more financially attractive, does the team get its pick back or its money back? That scenario, he suggested, could be the next battle the sport faces. Cleveland’s quarterback controversy is another example of how unpredictable football has become. For the Browns, all of those bigger questions recede once Week 1 arrives.

The decision has been made. Watson is the starter. There are no more excuses, no more speculation, and no more public competition. He now has the opportunity to prove Cleveland right.

But if the boos return and the failures continue, the Browns may find themselves with a quarterback controversy that becomes impossible to control. Cleveland did not just pick a starter. They picked a side.

Now Watson has to prove they chose correctly.